MADHAI v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TAHSIL KAISERGANJ, BAHRAICH AND OTHERS
A227/5426/2025 · 2025-09-10
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5426 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1 and Shri Rajendra Prasad Lodhi, Advocate, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2, which is taken on record.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.2 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Kaiserganj, District Bahraich to decide the Case No.T20160815035052, under Section 38 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Village Aladadpur, Pargana Fakharpur, Tahsil Kaiserganj, District Bahraich, which is pending since 08.06.2025, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Kaiserganj, District Bahraich, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Kaiserganj, District Bahraich is directed to decide Case Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajey Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Madhai .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Kaiserganj, Bahraich And Others .....Respondent(s)
No.T20160815035052, under Section 38 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Village Aladadpur, Pargana Fakharpur, Tahsil Kaiserganj, District Bahraich, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 10, 2025 KR A227 No. 5426 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench