SMT. AMARDEI @ AMBARDEI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TAHSIL HASSANGANJ, UNNAO AND OTHERS
A227/5429/2025 · 2025-09-10
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163697 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163697 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5429 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2.
2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.3 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Lekhpal Revenue Village Miyaganj, Pargana Asiwan Rasoolabad, Tehsil Hasanganj, District Unnao to decide the Interim Relief Application in Appeal No.16786/2025 filed under Section 207 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Ambar Dei vs. Mahadev), expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 / Lekhpal Revenue Village Miyaganj, Pargana Asiwan Rasoolabad, Tehsil Hasanganj, District Unnao considers and decides the aforesaid Interim Relief Application in the time bound manner.
5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the nterim Relief Application in Appeal No.16786/2025 filed under Section Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jyoti Rajpoot Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Amardei @ Ambardei .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil Hassanganj, Unnao And Others .....Respondent(s)
207 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Smt. Ambar Dei vs. Mahadev), along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 10, 2025 KR A227 No. 5429 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench