HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7743 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:- "For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying Petition, which is duly supported by an affidavit, it is expedient in the interest of justice that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quashed the entire proceedings of order dated 25.7.2021, Criminal Case No. 8641 of 2021 State Versus Santosh Rawat and another" passed by Learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 20, District Lucknow as well as charge sheet no.1/2019, charge sheet dated 21.1.2019, Case Crime No. 563/2018, U/S 323,504,506 I.P.C., P.S. Kakori, District- Lucknow, Learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 20, District Lucknow, against the petitioners, contained as Annexure No. 1 and 2 to the accompanying affidavit, in the interest of Justice. It is further prayed that during the pendency of the present Petition under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 BNSS, this Hon' ble may kindly be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the entire proceedings of order dated 25.7.2021, Criminal Case No. 8641 of 2021" State Versus Santosh Rawat and another" passed by Learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Sharma, Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Santosh Kumar Rawat And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Court No. 20, District Lucknow as well as charge sheet no.1/2019, charge sheet dated 21.1.2019, Case Crime No. 563/2018, U/S 323,504,506 I.P.C., P.S. Kakori, District- Lucknow, Learned Additional Civil Judge (S.D.) Court No. 20, District Lucknow, against the petitioners, contained as Annexure No. 1 and 2 against the petitioners to the accompanying affidavit, in the interest of Justice." 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 18, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7743 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench