Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
07.07.2025 Sl No.45-51 Court No.8 (gc)
FMA/1611/2016
SUKUMAR BAG & ORS VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
With
MAT/362/2016
SUKUMAR BAG VS ANUPAM SAHOO & ORS
IA NO: CAN/1/2016(Old No:CAN/3205/2016), CAN/3/2016(Old No:CAN/5004/2016)
With
MAT/363/2016
SUKUMAR BAG VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS
IA NO: CAN/1/2016(Old No:CAN/3208/2016), CAN/3/2016(Old No:CAN/5005/2016)
With
MAT/364/2016
SUKUMAR BAG VS ANUPAM SAHOO & ORS
IA NO: CAN/1/2016(Old No:CAN/3210/2016), CAN/3/2016(Old No:CAN/5006/2016)
With
MAT/475/2016
SUKUMAR BAG VS ANUPAM SAHOO & ORS
IA NO: CAN/1/2016(Old No:CAN/3214/2016)
2 With
MAT/477/2016
SUKUMAR BAG & ORS VS ANUPAM SAHOO & ORS
With
WPA/23447/2006
SUKUMAR BAG VS STATE OF W.B.
Ms. Tapati Samanta … for the State In item nos.46 to 50.
1. The appellants are not represented.
2. On 21st May, 2025, a prayer for adjournment was made on behalf of Mr. Goutam Acharya, learned Advocate representing the appellant. It appears that the matter was adjourned on 31st April, 2025 on which date the parties were also not represented.
3. It also appears that on 26th September, 2024, the appellants were directed to file composite list of dates and composite paper book. The said period was extended on 21st May, 2025. The record does not show that any paper book has been filed during the extended period. The appellants have also not served the memorandum of appeal, composite list of dates and composite paper book upon Mrs. Samanta nor law notes in the meantime.
3
4. It appears that the appellants are not interested to proceed with the appeal.
5. Accordingly, the appeals and the connected applications are dismissed for default.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Soumen Sen, J.)
(Smita Das De, J.)