Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16366 (GAU)

SMTI. SNEHA HATI BARUA and ANR, v. SHREE NILUTPAL GOGOI and ORS,

RSA/16/2011 · 2025-09-17

Susmita Phukan Khaund

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010160762011 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/16/2011 SMTI. SNEHA HATI BARUA and ANR, W/O LATE KANAILAL HATIBARUA 2: DURGADHAR HATIBARUA S/O LATE GHANAKANTA HATI BARUA BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF KARANGA HATI CHUNGI KOMAR GAON KATONY MOUZA JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM VERSUS SHREE NILUTPAL GOGOI and ORS, UPON THE DEATH OF NANI GOGOI, HER LEGAL HEIRS 2:SHREE UTPAL GOGOI 3:DR. PADUM GOGOI ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF JAIL ROAD JORHAT P.S. JORHAT DIST. JORHAT. 4:PARAG HATI BARUA S/O LATE KANAILAL HATIBARUA R/O HATIBARUAH TOL KARANGA HATI CHUNGI KOMAR GAON KATONI MOUZA Page No.# 2/2 JORHAT DIST.JORHAT ASSAM. 5:SMTI PREETI HATI BARUA GOGOI W/O SRI SAILEN GOGOI ASSTT. PROFESSOR ASSAM AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY RO NA-ALI BALIA GOHAIN PUKHURI JORHAT DIST. JORHAT Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B SARMA, MR. P BHUYAN,MR. S BANIK Advocate for the Respondent : MR.S P CHOUDHURY, MR.S C KEYAL,N CHOUDHURY,MR.S K GHOSH BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 18.09.2025 Learned counsel Mr. S. Banik is present for the appellant and learned counsel Mr. S. P. Choudhury is present for the respondents. The appellant No. 2 has passed away. Therefore, this case against the appellant No. 2 is awaited. Appellant No. 1 is not willing to pursue this appeal. Thereby, this appeal remains closed. The order of stay in connection with MC No. 159/2011 remains vacated. Send back the original Trial Court Records as well as the original Appellate Court Records. JUDGE Comparing Assistant