GHANSHYAM PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/10697/2025 · 2025-09-15
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163656 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163656 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10697 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for grant of Assured Career Progression Scheme benefit and for issuance of revised pension payment order in pursuance thereof.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the opposite party no.2 i.e. District Magistrate, District Gonda who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandresh Mani Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ghanshyam Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench