JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV ALIAS JITENDRA YADAV YADUVANSHI ALIAS JEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10708/2024 · 2025-08-07
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163639 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163639 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46222 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10708 of 2024 Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Yadav Alias Jitendra Yadav Yaduvanshi Alias Jedi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Umesh Kumar Yadav,Ambrish Kumar Pandey,Anagh Shukla,Laxmi Kant Tiwari,Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bahar Ali Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Shri Umesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Jayant Singh Tomar, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.99 of 2024 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 325, 504, 120-B I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal law Amendment Act registered at Police Station- Ram Janmabhumi, District- Faizabad/Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 17.06.2024 against five named persons, not including the applicant and some unnamed persons, stating that because of a dispute regarding a shop, when the informant was getting CCTV cameras installed in the shop, the accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members with sticks. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 5. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith the copies of material collected during investigation. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that a co- accused Dhananjay Das, who is named in the FIR, has been granted bail by means of an order dated 19.07.2024 passed by the Session Court. 7. When a person who is named in the FIR has already been released on bail whereas the applicant is not named in the FIR; the applicant is languishing in jail since 17.08.2024 whereas the investigation stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9.
Let the applicant- Jitendra Kumar Yadav Alias Jitendra Yadav Yaduvanshi Alias Jedi be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 7.8.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench