1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO No.224 of 2025 Date of Decision : 20.08.2025 Hem Chand Sharma …… Appellant Versus Veena Bakshi and another ……Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 No For the appellant : Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Nemo. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the appellant, under instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to move an appropriate application for modification of impugned order under Order 39 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Code. 2. Permission granted. Liberty reserved to move an appropriate application, in accordance with law. Accordingly, present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, so also, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Bipin Chander Negi) August 20, 2025 (KS) Judge 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?