HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 964 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call. 2. The matter is being listed for the third time, which shows that the petitioner is not serious in pursuing the matter. 3. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.5 and 6 and Sri Jaiyesh Bhoosreddy, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.7. The Vakalatna is taken on record. September 19, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saakshi Pandey, Om Shankar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey, Namit Sharma, Ratnesh Chandra (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Karunesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench