HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5421 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State respondent no.1. 2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "direct the opp. Party no. 1 Nayab Tehsildar Ayodhya District Ayodhya to decide the mutation proceeding vide Case no. 480/2017 Computerized case no. T201704234504480 U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code 2006 Rajesh Versus Sahab Baksh Situated Village Bakauli pargana Khandasa Tehsil Milkipur District Ayodhya Pending in the court of Nayab Tehsildar Ayodhya District Ayodhya fixed on 02.09.2025 expeditiously within stipulated time granted by this Hon'ble court to meet the end of justice As contained in Annexure no. 1 to this petition." 3. Previous order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 22.10.2024 passed in Matter Under Article 227 No.4897 of 2024 are existed for expediting the proceedings, which is quoted as under: "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganga Prasad Mishra, Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajesh .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar Milkipur, Faizabad / Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) to the private-respondent No.2 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his mutation proceedings in Case No.480 of 2017; Computerized Case no.T201704234504480 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.480 of 2017; Computerized Case no.T201704234504480 filed under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. " 4. Accordingly, for the same relief, the second petition would not be maintainable and is hereby dismissed. September 10, 2025 KR A227 No. 5421 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench