Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163602 (ALL)

ADITY KUMAR @ PANKAJ YADAV AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/992/2025 · 2025-09-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 992 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ravindra Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Mayank Sinha, learned AGA for the State. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press this bail application as the applicants want to appear before the trial court and seek their release on bail. 3. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicants to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Adity Kumar @ Pankaj Yadav And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench