Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1636 (AP)

M/S MAKK INFRA v. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I.A.S

CC/4209/2025 · 2026-04-16

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HN, J C.C.No.4209_2025 APHC010664012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4209/2025 Between: 1. M/S MAKK INFRA, FLAT NO. 212, B-BLOCK, SRMT APARTMENTS RAMANAYYAPETA, SARPAVARAM JUNCTION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. - 533001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER KASILANKA SRI RANGATEJA. 2. 2. KASILANKA SRI RANGATEJA, S/O. MADHU KUMAR, AGED 33 YEARS, OCCCONTRACTOR, R/O. H.NO. 6-43, MAIN ROAD,MADUGU CENTER, PONNAMANDA VILLAGE, RAZOLE MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. - 533248 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522238 2 2. SRI B PREMAKUMARI, THE DIRECTOR OF WORKS AND ACCOUNT OFFICER, NIDHI BHAVAN, MANGALAGIRI IT PARK, BEHIND APIIC BUILDING, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522302 3. 3. SRI M PRABHAKARA RAO, THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING (PHMED), AP TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 52250 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may HN, J C.C.No.4209_2025 be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willful violation of orders of this Honble Court in WP.No. 25202 of 2025 dated 23-09-2025 delivered by Honble Sri. Justice Harinath.N and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. T LAKSHMI PADMAJA HN, J C.C.No.4209_2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been duly complied with by the respondents. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:17.04.2026 NKA HN, J C.C.No.4209_2025 290 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4209 of 2025 Date: 17.04.2026 NKA