Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163594 (ALL)

M/S SHIV DAYAL MURARI LAL RICE AND DAL MILL THRU. PARTNER SRI OM PRAKASH MAHAWAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AND AGRI. FOREIGN TRADE AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/8869/2025 · 2025-09-11

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8869 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for the State-opposite party, Shri Aditya Mohan, Advocate, who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party nos.2 and 3 by filing his 'vakalatnama', which is taken on record and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following main prayer: "1. to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1and 2 to direct and allow market committee, Seetapur, respondent no. 3 to refund of the amount of market fee and development cess deposited as security, in lieu of the bank guarantee, for the paddy purchased to produce rice for export, wrongly withheld by respondents, with equal rate of interest mentioned in the Act;" 3. Learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 and 3 has served order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar/Chairman, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti upon learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Srivastava, Avadhesh Kumar Singh, Baldau Ji Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surendra Kumar Singh M/S Shiv Dayal Murari Lal Rice And Dal Mill Thru. Partner Sri Om Prakash Mahawar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Agricultural Marketing And Agri. Foreign Trade And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 and 3 have no objection to the same. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 11, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 8869 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench