Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16357 (HP)

Rajul Kishan v. State of HP

CRMPM/1291/2025 · 2025-06-24

Virender Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:HHC:19529 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 1291 of 2025 Reserved on : 20.6.2025 Decided on : 24.6.2025 Rajul Kishan …Applicant Versus State of H.P. …Respondent _______________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting? ________________________________________________ For the Applicant : Mr. Devinder Chauhan Jaita, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Varun Chandel and Mr. H.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocate Generals with Ms. Ranjna Patial, Dy. A.G. Virender Singh, Judge Applicant Rajul Kishan has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS’) for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, in case FIR No. 20 of 2025, 2 2025:HHC:19529 dated 20.4.2025, registered under Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS’ Act), with Police Station, Ram Shehar, District Solan, H.P. 2. The applicant has pleaded the fact that he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case. 3. According to the applicant, investigation in the present case is almost complete and nothing is to be recovered, from the possession of the accused. 4. The applicant has also sought the relief of bail on the ground that he is young man of 22 years of age and student of ITI Jalog. 5. Apart from the present case, no other case is stated to have been registered against the applicant. All these facts have been pleaded to show that he is not involved in the present case. 6. The applicant has tried his luck by moving the similar application application before the learned 3 2025:HHC:19529 Special Judge, Nalagarh, which was dismissed on 24.5.2025. 7. The applicant, through his counsel, has undertaken to abide by the terms and conditions, to be imposed by this court, in case, he is ordered to be released on bail, during the pendency of the trial. 8. On these submissions, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application. 8.1. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 19.4.2025, I.O., H.C.Deepak Kumar No. 39, alongwith other police officials, was on patrolling/picketing duty, in the jurisdiction of Police Station, Ramshehar. At about 10:55 p.m., the I.O., alongwith other police officials, was present at Ramshahar-Nalagarh road and when they reached near CHC Ram Shehar, then, he noticed a black coloured Scorpio bearing registration No. PB12Q-6205, being driven by its driver, which was signalled to stop, upon which, the driver has stopped the vehicle. On inquiry, driver 4 2025:HHC:19529 disclosed his name as Mohammaddeen, and the person sitting by his side disclosed his name as Rajul Kishan, S/o Jai Kishan (applicant). The person sitting behind the driver seat, on inquiry, disclosed his name as Nasib Rehman. All the three occupants of the vehicle were inquired about their movement in the odd hours of the night. However, none of them could give satisfactory answer. 8.2 Hence, the driver of the vehicle was directed to show the requisite documents and driving license, but, he could not produce the requisite documents, nor the driver could produce the driving license. As such, the vehicle was detained and independent witness Rakesh Kumar was requested to come to the spot. 8.3 Thereafter, in the presence of the independent witnesses, said vehicle was searched. Underneath the cover of driver seat, a transparent polythene, containing two transparent packets were found, which, on opening, were found to be containing a 5 2025:HHC:19529 light brown coloured granule shaped substance, which, on the basis of experience, was found to be chitta. All the three occupants of the vehicle also confirmed the same to be chitta. On weighment, the Chitta/Heroin was found to be 32.74 grams. Registration Certificate was also found from the dash board of the vehicle and the same was found to have been registered in the name of Devender Singh. Other codal formalities were completed. 8.4 During personal search of accused Naseeb rehman, one foil paper, one lighter, half burnt currency notes, alongwith currency notes of denomination of Rs.6100/- were found, which were taken into possession. After registration of the case, all the three accused were arrested. 8.5 On 22.4.2025, the case property was produced before the Court of learned ACJM, Nalagarh, where proceedings, under Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, were conducted. During police remand, accused Nasib Rehman and accused 6 2025:HHC:19529 Mohammaddeen disclosed that chitta was purchased from one Anif. The case property was thereafter sent to SFSL, Junga, from where, positive report has been received. 8.6 No other criminal case is found to have been registered against the applicant Rajul Kishan. 9. On 26.6.2025, applicant has produced the photo copy of the Aadhar Card, as well as, the copy of permanent resident certificate, according to which, the applicant is resident of Village Chanderpur, Tehsil Jubbal, District Shimla, H.P. 10. On the basis of above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the bail application. 11. Contraband, allegedly recovered, in the present case, does not fall within the definition of ‘commercial quantity’. As such, rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable to the facts of the present case. 12. Investigation in the present case is stated to be completed, as according to the status report, 7 2025:HHC:19529 charge sheet has been filed on 18.6.2025, before the competent Court of law. Considering the said fact, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the applicant is no longer required by the Police. 13. The applicant is permanent resident of District Shimla, as such, it cannot be said that in case, he is ordered to be released on bail, he may not be available for trial. 14. Chances of conclusion of trial, against the applicant, are not so bright, in near future, as such, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant in judicial custody, that too, for indefinite period. 15. No other case is found to have been registered against the applicant, as such, presumption of innocence is still available to him, till his guilt is proved by the prosecution, during trial. 16. The applicant is a young man of 22 years, having no criminal antecedents, and in case, his bail application is rejected, he will remain in judicial 8 2025:HHC:19529 custody, that too in the company of hardened criminals, which would affect his future. 17. Bail application cannot be rejected as a matter of punishment, as pre-trial punishment is prohibited, under the law. 18. Considering all these facts, this Court is of the view that the bail application is liable to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. 19. Consequently, the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in case FIR No. 20 of 2025, dated 20.4.2025, registered under Sections 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act, with Police Station, Ram Shehar, District Solan, H.P., on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-, with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. 20. This order, however, shall be subject to the following conditions:- a) Applicant shall regularly attend the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and if prevented by any reason to do so, seek exemption from appearance by filing the appropriate application; 9 2025:HHC:19529 b) Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence nor hamper the investigation of the case in any manner whatsoever; c) Applicant shall not make any inducement, threat or promises to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer, and d) Applicant shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court. 21. Any of the observations, made herein above, shall not be taken, as an expression of opinion, on the merits of the case, as these observations are confined, only to the disposal of the present bail application. 22. It is made clear that the respondent-State is at liberty to move an appropriate application, in case, any of the bail conditions is found to be violated by the applicant. 23. The Registry is directed to forward a soft copy of the bail order to the Superintendent of Sub-Jail, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P., through e-mail, with a direction to enter the date of grant of bail in the e- prison software. 10 2025:HHC:19529 24. In case, the applicant is not released within a period of seven days from the date of grant of bail, the Superintendent of Sub-Jail, Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. is directed to inform this fact to the Secretary, DLSA, Solan. The Superintendent of the Sub-Jail, Nalagarh, is further directed that if the applicant fails to furnish the bail bonds, as per the order passed by this Court within a period of one month from today, then, the said fact be submitted to this Court. (Virender Singh) Judge June 24, 2025 Kalpana Digitally signed by RAJNI Date: 2025.06.24 16:11:31 IST