Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16357 (AP)

Mallipudi rama subba rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14278/2020 · 2025-03-21

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010216672020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 14278/2020 Between: Mallipudi Rama Subba Rao ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHANDRA SEKHAR ILAPAKURTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following order: 1. The petitioner claims that he is absolute owner and possessor of house site admeasuring an extent of 128.97 sq.yards in block No.6 in Sy.No.224-1 of Venturu Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, by virtue of a registered settlement deed dated 23.07.2020, executed by his father. 2. It is his further case that originally his grandfather was absolute owner, in turn, executed a registered will deed dated 20.07.1926 bequeathing the subject property in favour of his father. He further contends that later by issue of gift deed dated 23.07.2020, he became owner of the land in dispute and since then he is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property without any interference from anybody. It is his further case also that on 11.08.2020, the 4th respondent tried to interfere with his possession without issuing any notice, so as to allot the subject lands for house sites to the eligible beneficiaries under Navaratnalu Pedalandariki Illu Scheme, the present writ petition came to be filed. 3. This Court, while ordering notice, on 18.08.2020 passed an interim order directing the respondents to maintain status quo existing as on that day and the said interim order is subsisting till today. 4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that in view of the interim order passed by this Court, the respondents have not interfered with the possession of the petitioner over the subject land. 5. In view of the said submission, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the subject land admeasuring an extent of 128.97 sq.yards in Sy.No.224-1, Block No.6, Venturu Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District. If the land in dispute is required for any public purpose, the respondents are at liberty to initiate action as per law. 6. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date: 21.03.2025 JLV 255 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 14278/2020 Date: 21.03.2025 JLV