Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163566 (ALL)

RAMAPATI MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 4 OTHERS

/952/2025 · 2025-09-12

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 952 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties concerned to immediately remove the illegal encroachment raised by Respondent No. 5 over Khatauni Khata Number-00734, Gata Number-480/00540 hectare recorded as "Nali" of village Khalispur Deegur, Pargana Aldemou, Tehsil- Kadipur, District-Sultanpur." 3. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon the instructions, states that the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated and are pending. 4. In view of the said statement, the present petition is disposed of with direction to conclude the proceedings expeditiously within the time prescribed under the statute, i.e., 90 days. September 12, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar, Rajkumar Chaurasia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ramapati Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench