KAMAL KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/10468/2025 · 2025-09-09
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163556 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10468 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 15.6.2025 whereby petitioner has been transferred from Ghaziabad to District Agra.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner is undergoing treatment for kidney malfunction in Ghaziabad itself, therefore, petitioner may be exempted from transfer in terms of paragraph 5(iii) of the Transfer Policy dated 6.5.2025 issued by the State Government.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within three days before the opposite party no. 3-Inspector General of Police (Establishment), Uttar Pradesh Police Headquarter, Signature Building Shaheed Path, Gomti Nagar Extension, Luknow or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same within ten days from the date of production of a certified copy of this order is submitted before the concerned authority.
4. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. Till decision of petitioner's representation, he shall not be compelled to join at transfer place. (Manish Mathur,J.) September 9, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Pathak, Km. Swati Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Kamal Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench