HARISH CHANDRA v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL TARABAGANJ, MANDAL DEVIPATAN, GONDA AND 3 OTHERS
A227/5420/2025 · 2025-09-10
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5420 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.2 and 3 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabaganj, Mandal Devipatan, Gonda, District Gonda to decide the Case No.5245 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202408300605245) "Harish Chandra vs. Dayaram and other" under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabaganj, Mandal Devipatan, Gonda, District Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1/ Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabaganj, Mandal Devipatan, Gonda, District Gonda is directed to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Pandey, Akash Tiwari, Arpit Dwivedi, Shivam Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Harish Chandra .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabaganj, Mandal Devipatan, Gonda And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
decide the the Case No.5245 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202408300605245) "Harish Chandra vs. Dayaram and other" under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 10, 2025 KR A227 No. 5420 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench