Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163545 (ALL)

RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5378/2025 · 2025-09-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5378 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.3 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 / Settlement Officer Consolidation, Judicial, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur to decide the Appeal in Case No.0341 of 2024 "Rajendra Pratap Singh and others vs. Lalmani" under Section 11(1) of U.P.C.H. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2/ Settlement Officer Consolidation, Judicial, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 / Settlement Officer Consolidation, Judicial, Tehsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur is directed to decide Case No.0341 of 2024 "Rajendra Pratap Singh and others vs. Lalmani" under Section 11(1) of U.P.C.H. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of eight Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Bhooshan, Brijesh Kumar, Kaushalendra K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajendra Pratap Singh And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 KR A227 No. 5378 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench