SHAKIYA BEGUM v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, LAMBHUA, SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER
/5479/2025 · 2025-09-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163540 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5479 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Manuvendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, District - Sultanpur, for expeditious disposal of amendment application dated 17.07.2025, under Section 152 CPC, filed in Case No. T 202104680305199 - Nawab Khan Vs. Gaon Panchayat, under Section 33/39 of the U.P. Revenue Code,
2006.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, District - Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
4. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of amendment application dated 17.07.2025, under Section 152 CPC, filed in Case No. T 202104680305199 - Nawab Khan Vs. Gaon Panchayat, under Section 33/39 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of.
September 12, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manuvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Shakiya Begum .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lambhua, Sultanpur And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench