Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163534 (ALL)

SMT. SEEMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/8809/2025 · 2025-09-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8809 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that an order assessing deficiency of stamp duty was passed against the petitioner on 25.10.2023, against which the petitioner has preferred an appeal along with the interim application, however, the same is yet to be decided and on the other hand, the recovery certificate has been issued. 3. Without going into the merits of the claim, the present petition is disposed off directing the appellate authority to decide the interim application filed by the petitioner positively within a period of four weeks. Till the decision on the interim relief application, the recovery shall remain stayed. September 11, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Mishra, Vidya Bhushan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Smt. Seema .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench