HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10520 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Petitioner is granted liberty to implead the Board of Revenue, U.P. through its Chairman as opposite party no.6 during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel has accepted notice on behalf of opposite party no.6. 3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Board of Revenue to provide relevant information to the state government so that decision with regard to benefits of salary, difference of salary, removal of anomaly in fixation of pay scale and correction of pension and other retiral benefits of petitioner may be sanctioned. 4. It is submitted that earlier with regard to aforesaid grievance, petitioner had filed Writ-A No.7798 of 2024 which was disposed of vide order dated 12.09.2024 directing the Chairman Board of Revenue, U.P. to take a decision on petitioner's representation. 5. It is further submitted that in pursuance thereof, the Board of Revenue vide letter dated 17.12.2024 forwarded the entire dispute to the state government for taking a decision whereafter certain informations has been sought by the state government vide letter dated 22.04.2025 which has not been supplied and in the meantime the petitioner's grievance is still not addressed. 6. Learned State Counsel in rebuttal submits that after passing of the order dated 12.09.2024 in the earlier writ petition of petitioner, Contempt Petition No.1168 of 2025 was filed and is pending consideration in which such an aspect can very well be considered. 7. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and perusal of material on record, it is evident that despite directions issued by this Court on 12.09.2024, petitioner's grievance still remains unaddressed by the authorities who Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shrikant Tripathi, Kirti Kar Tripathi, Sandeep Kumar Ojha, Touqeer Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Om Prakash Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Personnel U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) are merely forwarding letters to each other. 8. In view of the fact that the matter now has been sent to the state government for taking a decision in terms of letter dated 17.12.2024, the opposite parties no.4 and 6 are collectively directed to consider the grievance of petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon them. 9. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. September 10, 2025 Shahnaz WRIA No. 10520 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench