BABI @ SAKIR v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO.
A482/7540/2025 · 2025-09-09
Shree Prakash Singh
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163512 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163512 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7540 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the applicant to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every two cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all the two cases. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in two cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1) Case Crime No. 107 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of Gangster Act, Police Station Sangipur, District Pratapgarh. 2) Case Crime No. 31 of 2021, under Section 2/3 of Gangster Act, Police Station Udaipur, District Pratapgarh. He next added that despite, this Court granted the bail in aforesaid matters, the applicant is still in jail. Being poor person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Babi @ Sakir .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioners to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgement passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). Considering the aforesaid fact, this application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed.
September 9, 2025 kkv/ A482 No. 7540 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench