PRITI KANNAUJIYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/3623/2025 · 2025-04-07
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:51728 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3623 of 2025 Petitioner :- Priti Kannaujiya And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faizur Rahman Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents and Sri Vinod Singh,
learned counsel appeared on behalf of respondent no.4.
2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, apprised the Court that the address which has been mentioned for seeking police protection is itself wrong and so far as the report of concerned police station, the petitioners are not residing over the address as mentioned in the petition and as such no prayer can be exceeded.
4. In view thereof, present petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.4.2025 Saif Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad