Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163496 (MAD)

Tvl Punithan Stores v. The Assistant Commissioner(ST)

WP(MD)/25255/2025 · 2025-09-16

G R Swaminathan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.25255 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P(MD)No.25255 of 2025 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.19802 and 19805 of 2025 Tvl. Punithan Stores, Represented by its Partner, Paul Rajan Kasi, 106, Nethaji Road, Madurai – 625 001. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Tamil Nadu Commercial Tax Department, Nethaji Road Assessment Circle, Dr.Thangaraj Salai, Madurai – 625 020. 2.The Deputy Commissioner ST, GST Appeal, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangaraj Salai, Madurai – 625 020. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in respect of impugned Orders under Section 74(9) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.25255 of 2025 read with Rule 142(5) of the Act, 2017 under Reference No.ZD330725016618B dated 02-07-2025 and Form GST DRC-07 Summary of the Order dated 02-07-2025 along with Annexure under Reference GSTIN No.33AABFP0190P1Z5/2020-2021 dated 30-06-2025 passed by the First Respondent and Quash the same as it is illegal and in gross violation of principles of natural justice and further direct the First Respondent to pass orders afresh after providing opportunity of personal hearing as per provisions of the GST Act, 2017. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Renganathan For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaselan, Government Advocate. ORDER Heard both sides. 2.The order impugned in the writ petition can very well be questioned before the appellate authority. The petitioner is also having sufficient time to do so. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the explanation given by the assessee has not been considered by the assessing officer. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.25255 of 2025 This point also can very well be canvassed before the appellate authority. The appellate authority would be obliged to consider the explanation to be given by the petitioner herein. In fiscal matters, the Writ Court should think twice before permitting the assessee to by-pass the appeal remedy. 4.Granting liberty to the writ petitioner to move the appellate authority, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 16.09.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Tamil Nadu Commercial Tax Department, Nethaji Road Assessment Circle, Dr.Thangaraj Salai, Madurai – 625 020. 2.The Deputy Commissioner ST, GST Appeal, Commercial Taxes Building, Dr.Thangaraj Salai, Madurai – 625 020. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.25255 of 2025 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. ias W.P(MD)No.25255 of 2025 16.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis