HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5412 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Modanwal, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 3 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil and District - Amethi, to execute order dated 19.04.2025, passed in Case No. 4318 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202504710504318) - Ajay Kumar and Others Vs. Gheeshan and Others, U/S 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 with regard to land bearing Gata No. 447, area 0.0760 hectares, situated at Village - Chhachha, Pargana - Asal, Tehsil and District - Amethi, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 3 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil and District - Amethi, executes the order dated 19.04.2025, in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 3 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil and District - Amethi , is directed to ensure compliance/execution of order dated 19.04.2025, passed in Case No. 4318 of 2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202504710504318) - Ajay Kumar and Others Vs. Gheeshan and Others, U/S 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 with regard to land bearing Gata No. 447, area 0.0760 hectares, situated at Village - Chhachha, Pargana - Asal, Tehsil and District - Amethi, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kumar Modanwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ajay Kumar And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench