INDRA INSTITUTE OF PARAMEDICAL AND NURSING COLLEGE THRU. AUTH. SIGNATORY MR. DILIP KUMAR RATHAUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF/ PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF MED. EDU. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/8746/2025 · 2025-09-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163491 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163491 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8746 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Sanjay Bhasin, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Palash Banerjee, Shri Aviral Raj Singh and Mohd. Yasir, learned counsel(s) for the petitioner and Shri Utkarsh Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 03.09.2025 whereby the representation of the petitioner for issuance of admit card after taking requisite fees was rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner had paid the amount, however, on account of glitch in the banking channel, the amounts could not be debited. The petitioner had filed a petition being Writ - C No.8613 of 2025. In the said writ petition, documents were annexed to demonstrate that there was sufficient balance in the account and on account of banking glitch, the amount could not be deposited. In the light of the said, this Court had directed that the petitioner should file a representation before respondent no.2 who would consider the case of the petitioner. 4. In terms of the liberty granted, a representation was filed, however, the same has been rejected only on the ground that this Court had passed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Palash Banerjee, Ashutosh Verma, Aviral Raj Singh, Mohd. Yasir, Vaibhav Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava Indra Institute Of Paramedical And Nursing College Thru. Auth. Signatory Mr. Dilip Kumar Rathaur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief/ Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Med. Edu. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
another order in Writ - C No.7914 of 2025 wherein benefits were granted to similarly placed persons, however, it was observed that the opportunity was a last opportunity and no extension shall be granted. Simply, in the light of the said observation, the representation has been rejected. 5. Considering the fact that while passing the order in Writ - C No.14.08.2025, the observation in Para 11 relates to the petitioners of Writ - C No.7914 of 2025 alone. The said directions cannot be general directions and are certainly not binding on the present petitioners who have approached this Court. 6. In view thereof, order impugned dated 03.09.2025 cannot be sustained and is quashed. 7. Respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner afresh. 8.
While doing so, respondents will take into consideration the statement of account of the petitioner which shall be submitted by the petitioner and a fresh order shall be passed ignoring Para 11 of the judgment dated 14.08.2025 passed in Writ - C No.7914 of 2025. 9. As the written examinations are scheduled from 09.09.2025, endeavour shall be made to accept the deposit from the petitioner and to allow the students to appear. 10. In any case, fresh order shall be passed within 24 hours. 11. Present petition stands allowed in above terms. September 3, 2025 nishant WRIC No. 8746 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench