Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16349 (GAU)

MONALISA ANDREW v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/5559/2021 · 2025-05-08

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010106222023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5559/2021 MONALISA ANDREW C/O MRS. PREMOLINI ANDREW R/O NAKARI WARD NO. 1 NORTH LAKHIMPUR PIN-787001 DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSAM P/R/A QUARTER NO. 25 LOKOPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR-784001 DIST- SONITPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE NEW DELHI 2:THE DIRECTOR LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH TEZPUR 784001 DIST SONITPUR ASSAM 3:THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI REGIONAL INSITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH Page No.# 2/2 TEZPUR 784001 DIST SONITPUR ASSAM 4:THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL (CAG) OF INDIA DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAYA MARG NEW DELHI 110124 5:NORTH EASTERN COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN ROOM NO. 410 1ST FLOOR NEC SECRETARIAT NONGRIM HILLS SHILLONG 793003 MEGHALAYA ------------ Advocate for : MR B D DAS Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER 09.05.2025 Heard Ms. K.L.R. Yanthan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A.K. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1, 2 & 3; Mr. R.K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 and Mr. B. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5. It is stated at the Bar that, in view of the Judgment and Order dated 24.04.2025 passed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 132/2025, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant