HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10536 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to provide pensionary benefits to petitioner in terms of judgment and order dated 17.02.2023 passed in Writ-A No. 9665 of 2019. 3. With regard to aforesaid prayer made, a Full Bench of this Court in the case of Prayas Buildcon Private Limited versus State of U.P., AIR 2022 Alld 279 has already held that writ petition to ensure compliance of judgments rendered by writ Courts is maintainable. 4. Learned State Counsel despite time being granted has not been provided any instructions in this matter. 5. Looking to the innocuous prayer being made without entering into merits, opposite party no.2 i.e. Collector, Budaun is directed to take final decision with regard to ensure compliance of the aforesaid judgment, in case the same has not been set aside, modified or varied by any Court of competent jurisdiction. Compliance shall be ensured within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon concerned authority. 6. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 12, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amarendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Smt. Anjum Bi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench