SANIDUL SK @ SONIDUL SK @ ROSUL SK @ ROSUL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (DB)/1069/2025 · 2025-05-22
Suvra Ghosh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16348 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16348 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
20 22.05.2025 Ct.No.34 b.das Rejected C.R.M. (DB) 1069 of 2025
In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 filed in connection with Raghunathganj Police Station Case No.579 of 2024 dated 01.06.2024 under Sections 395/397/412/109/120B/202/212 of the Indian Penal Code adding Section 13/14 of the Foreigners Act.
And
In Re : Sanidul Sk. @ Sonidul Sk. @ Rosul Sk. @ Rosul
... Petitioner.
Mr. Kalidas Saha Ms. Khushi Mollick
... for the petitioner.
Ms. Subhasree Patel Ms. Ankita Paul
... for the State.
Heard learned counsels for the parties. The petitioner is in custody for about a year and prays for bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. It appears that the petitioner has been identified as one of the members of the gang who allegedly committed the offence. Considering the material on record and prima facie involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. The application for bail is thus disposed of. Case diary be returned. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
2 Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)