IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 9614/2025 Decided on: 17.06.2025 Kamla Devi …Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta and Mr. Bonit Parkash, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Petitioner seeks benefit of decision rendered in Roop Lal Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 and also the benefit of decision in Sunder Singh Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.3 for claiming the family pension. It is seen from the record that the petitioner has not represented to the respondents/competent authority for the redressal of her grievances. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, she is 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 LPA No.196/2022 decided on 11.10.2023 3 Civil Appeal No.6309/2017 decided on 08.03.2018 2 permitted to make a representation to the respondents/competent authority. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents/competent authority, within a period of two weeks from today for the redressal of her grievances. In case, such representation is so made, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondents/competent authority as expeditiously as possible preferably within six weeks. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 17th June, 2025(rohit)