NALNEESH @ MANJU RAWAT v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7550/2025 · 2025-09-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7550 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard Shri Ankit Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:-
"For the facts, reasons and circumstances stated in the accompanying petition duly supported with Affidavit, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to stay the entire criminal proceeding initiated against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned charge sheet dated 11.04.2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 0103/2021, under sections 308, 323 IPC, Police Station P.G.I., District Lucknow (Criminal case No 108553/2024 State versus Nalneesh @ Manju Rawat & Another) pending in, the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow as well as summoning order dated 11.11.2024 passed by Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow."
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ankit Kumar Pandey, Rajendra Prasad Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nalneesh @ Manju Rawat .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 9, 2025 Mohd.
Sharif A482 No. 7550 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench