HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10471 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no.1 to 3, and Sri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for respondents no.4 and 5. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.03.2025 the gratuity has still not been paid to the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.5 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.5 then respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 11, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shivam Sharma (Abdul Moin,J.) Vimla Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench