Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163434 (ALL)

RAVI KUMAR v. NAIB TEHSILDAR AMANIGANJ, TEHSIL MILKIPUR , MANDAL, AYODHYA AND 4 OTHERS

A227/5387/2025 · 2025-09-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5387 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Prashant Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Naib Tehsildar Amaniganj, Tehsil - Milkipur, Division and District - Ayodhya, to decide Case No. 5963 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230405963) - Ravi Kumar Vs. Ram Awadh, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar Amaniganj, Tehsil - Milkipur, Division and District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Naib Tehsildar Amaniganj, Tehsil - Milkipur, Division and District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide Case No. 5963 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230405963) - Ravi Kumar Vs. Ram Awadh, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Ravi Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Naib Tehsildar Amaniganj, Tehsil Milkipur , Mandal, Ayodhya And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench