HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1188 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned trial Court not to insist the applicant to file separate sureties and bonds in each and every five cases and accept only two sureties and one personal bond in lieu of all the five cases. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties and bonds in each of cases, in which, he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in five cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers : 1) Case Crime No.0483/2025 lodged at Police Station Kotwali Nagar District Barabanki; 2) Case Crime No.057/2025 lodged at Police Station Kotwali Nagar District Barabanki; 3) Case Crime No.1071/2024 lodged at Police Station Kotwali Nagar District Barabanki; 4) Case Crime No.03/2025 lodged at Police Station Itaunja District Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gauri Suwan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shubham Shukla .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Lucknow; and 5) Case Crime No.0306/2024 lodged at Police Station B.K.T. District Lucknow 4. He next added that despite the applicant has been granted bail in the aforesaid cases, he is still in jail. Being poo person, he is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioners to submit separate personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Referring the aforesaid judgement and order, he submits that the applicant may also be given the benefit of the ratio of the judgment passed in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (supra). 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, the application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. September 9, 2025 MVS/- NA528 No. 1188 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench