NIHARIKA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
A483/759/2025 · 2025-09-15
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163422 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163422 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 759 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant informed that certain correct are necessary to the carried out in the application. Thus, he is permitted to carry out the necessary amendment in the present application during the course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./ 529 BNSS has been filed with the following prayer:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct to the concerned court for expeditious and proper disposal of Criminal Case No. 248 of 2024,"State Vs. Sumit Pratap Chand and others" arising out of Case Crime No. 40 of 2020, under section 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC and saction 3/4 of D.P, Act, Police Station - Mahila Thana, District- Ayodhya, pending before the court of Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. (W.O.) Ayodhya, , in the interest of law and justice."
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is still pending consideration since 2020 and the applicant is suffering hard for delay in conclusion of the trial proceedings. He urges that the interest of justice would be subserved if this Hon'ble Court is pleased enough to direct the Court below to conclude the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 248 of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohit Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Niharika Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
2024,"State Vs. Suchit Pratap Chand and others" arising out of Case Crime No. 40 of 2020, under section 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC and saction 3/4 of D.P, Act, Police Station - Mahila Thana, District- Ayodhya, within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. 5. The counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. 6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the Trial Court is hereby directed to conclude the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 248 of 2024,"State Vs.
Sumit Pratap Chand and others" arising out of Case Crime No. 40 of 2020, under section 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 of IPC and saction 3/4 of D.P, Act, Police Station - Mahila Thana, District- Ayodhya, in expedition, if there is no legal impediment, while considering the guidelines and circulars issued time to time in this regard. 7. The application is disposed off accordingly. September 15, 2025 V. Sinha A483 No. 759 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench