213 JAGAT SINGH THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE KALKA CUM PRESIDING OFFICER AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. the petitioner legal heirs of the petitioner 2. that the present peti Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.2628 Nath Vs. Deputy Commissi 29.09.2022, wherein death of the petitioner rebutted by the le IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2254 Date of Decision : 15 JAGAT SINGH VERSUS THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE KALKA CUM PRESIDING OFFICER AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karpal Singh Sirohi, Advocate for the respondent. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that unfortunately the petitioner-Senior Citizen has passed away but he wants to implead the legal heirs of the petitioner-Senior Citizen to pursue the present petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the present petition abates keeping in view the judgment ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.2628 Nath Vs. Deputy Commissioner, SAS Nagar Mohali and ors. 29.09.2022, wherein it has been held that death of the petitioner-Senior Citizen, which princip ebutted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2254-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15-07-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE KALKA CUM PRESIDING ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Advocate for the petitioner. Advocate for the respondent. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) arned counsel for the petitioner submits that unfortunately Senior Citizen has passed away but he wants to implead the Senior Citizen to pursue the present petition. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits keeping in view the judgment passed by the ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.26286 of 2019 titled “Kidar oner, SAS Nagar Mohali and ors.”, dated it has been held that the writ petition abates upon the , which principle of law has not been arned counsel for the petitioner. er THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE KALKA CUM PRESIDING ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI arned counsel for the petitioner submits that unfortunately Senior Citizen has passed away but he wants to implead the submits passed by the Kidar dated petition abates upon the of law has not been SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.16 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-2254-2024(O&M) -2- 3. Keeping in view the above, coupled with the fact that, the claim raised in the writ petition is still to be adjudicated and no order in favour of the petitioner-Senior Citizen has been passed so far hence, the present petition is disposed of as having been not pressed any further with the observations that no further orders are required to be passed as the petitioner has unfortunately died. 5. As no order on merit is being passed, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there was a Will of the petitioner-Senior Citizen and certain disputes are going on in the Civil Court hence, the same be decided in accordance with the law keeping in view the facts and evidence brought before the competent court. 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 15-07-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.16 14:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document