Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16339 (GAU)

SUNIL KR. BRAHMA v. THE BODOLAND TERRITORAL COUNCIL AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/4115/2023 · 2025-01-21

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010160152023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4115/2023 SUNIL KR. BRAHMA S/O KELENG BRAHMA, VILL- NO 2 BATABARI, P.O.-BATABARI, DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTAD), ASSAM VERSUS THE BODOLAND TERRITORAL COUNCIL AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BTC, P.O. AND DIST- KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM 2:THE SECRETARY MARKET AND FAIR DEPARTMENT BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR P.O. AND DIST-KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT - KOKRAJHAR (BTAD) ASSAM INDIA PIN-783370 4:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DOTMA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DIST - KOKRAJHAR (BTAD) ASSAM PIN-783347 5:KANAK BRAHMA S/O RAJENDRA NATH BRAHMA VILL- SHYMDHARPARA Page No.# 2/2 P.O.-DOTMA DIST-KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN-78334 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R DHAR, MR B C MUCHAHARY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, BTC, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 22-01-2025 Mr. R. Mazumder, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant