Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163388 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR PAL @ SANTOSH KUMAR v. NAYAB TEHSILDAR, SHIVGARH, TEHSIL RANIGANJ, PRATAPGARH, MANDAL- PRAYAGRAJ AND OTHERS

A227/5446/2025 · 2025-09-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5446 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Shivgarh, Tehsil Raniganj, District Pratapgarh to decide the Case No.2263 of 2021 (Computerized Case No.T-202102570502263) "Santosh Kumar vs. Yogesh Tiwari", under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Shivgarh, Tehsil Raniganj, District Pratapgarh , considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Nayab Tehsildar, Shivgarh, Tehsil Raniganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide the Case No.2263 of 2021 (Computerized Case No.T-202102570502263) "Santosh Kumar vs. Yogesh Tiwari", under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikrant Dwivedi, Prince Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Santosh Kumar Pal @ Santosh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Nayab Tehsildar, Shivgarh, Tehsil Raniganj, Pratapgarh, Mandal- Prayagraj And Others .....Respondent(s) production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 11, 2025 KR A227 No. 5446 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench