PRAFULL SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WPIL/951/2025 · 2025-09-10
Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163387 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163387 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 951 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. Heard Shri Suresh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Anupma Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel appearing for Gaon Sabha concerned. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State says that enquiry officer has already been appointed by the District Magistrate to conduct the preliminary enquiry on the complaint received against the Gram Pradhan. In view of the aforesaid statement given by the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, no further adjudication is required in these proceedings. It is accordingly dismissed. The District Magistrate will obviously take the proceedings to its logical conclusion, as per law. September 10, 2025 akhilesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Prafull Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AKHILESHWAR KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench