Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163381 (ALL)

RAMCHANDRA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. AYUSH ANUBHAG-I AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/10393/2025 · 2025-09-09

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10393 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of salary of medical period i.e. 03.11.2018 to 03.07.2019 amount of Rs.6,49,824/- along with interest within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make the payment of arrears of salary w.e.f. 01.01.2016 to 31.12.2016 amount of Rs.1,11,006/-, arrears of Dearness Allowances w.e.f. 01.01.2017 to 31.07.2017 amount of Rs.9,730/-, arrears of Dearness Allowances w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 31.12.2017 amount of Rs.4,278/-, bonus of financial year 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 is Rs.20,724/-, GIS amount Rs. 1,50,000/- and leave encashment amount of 300 days is Rs. 1050620/- along with interest within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 18.02.2025 so far as detaining salary of the medical period of the Petitioner passed by Opposite Party No.2 (contained as Annexure No.-4) with all consequential benefits." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Tauseef Siddiqui, Shiv Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ramchandra Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ayush Anubhag-I And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. It has been submitted that since no denial has been made by the impugned order dated 18.02.2025, prayer no.3 is being not pressed. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Ayush Anubhag-I, Government of U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 10393 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench