HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5425 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow to decide the substitution application dated 07.01.2025, pending in Case No.REV/1103/2024, (Computerized Case No.R20240862001103) Ram Sewak vs. Ram Pratap, under Section 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as aforesaid revision expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow considers and decides the aforesaid substitution application as well as revision in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the substitution application dated 07.01.2025, pending in Case No.REV/1103/2024, (Computerized Case No.R20240862001103) Ram Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Shanker, Lakkhi Chand Tyagi, Man Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Savitri Devi And Others .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue,U.P. Lucknow Thru. Chairman And Others .....Respondent(s) Sewak vs. Ram Pratap, under Section 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as well as aforesaid revision, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 10, 2025 KR A227 No. 5425 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench