Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163367 (ALL)

MAN SINGH YADAV @ MAN SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/8495/2025 · 2025-09-23

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8495 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Short counter affidavit along with power filed by Sri Neetesh Kumar, Advocate on behalf of the respondent no.4 is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Vinay Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Neetesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. 3. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the impugned first information report dated 12.08.2025 lodged by the opposite party No.4 contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioners in case crime No. 0401/2025, under section 115(2), 351(3), 352 BNS at Police Station Gosaiganj, District Lucknow South Commissionerate and also not take any corrosive steps against the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned first information report." 4. Learned A.G.A. has placed instructions dated 08.09.2025 duly signed by Mr. Rishabh Pandey, Sub Inspector, Police Station- Gosaiganj, District- Lucknow, which are taken on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Kumar Verma, Vinay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Man Singh Yadav @ Man Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of the aforesaid instructions, submits that the charge-sheet dated 30.08.2025 has already been prepared against the petitioners. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have entered into a compromise and settled their dispute, and the respondent no.4 has agreed for quashing of the impugned F.I.R.. 7. In view of above, the compromise annexed with the petition shall be received by learned counsel for the petitioners from the office forthwith, which shall be presented before the Circle Officer concerned who shall consider the same while considering the charge-sheet and remit the matter to the Investigating Officer for submitting the appropriate report after considering the same. 8. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. 9. Office shall return the original documents annexed with the petition to learned counsel for the petitioners after taking photocopies of the same. September 23, 2025 Arpan CRLP No. 8495 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench