HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 449 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. (Order on Criminal Misc. Application for condonation of delay/I.A. No.2 of 2025) The application under consideration is an application seeking condonation of delay of 2876 days in filing the revision filed in terms of Section 19 (4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 (in short "Act of 1984") challenging the order dated 04.08.2015 passed by the Family Court, Hardoi, in Misc. Case No.221 of 2013 (Smt. Kusumlata @ Kusumadevi Vs. Raj Kumar), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., whereby the Family Court has awarded the meager amount towards maintenance and the same can be deduced from the operative portion of the order 04.08.2015, quoted herein under :- "प्रािथनी श्रीमती कु सुमलता का प्राथर्नापत्र अन्तगतर् धारा-126 दण्ड प्रिक्रया संिहता एकपक्षीय रूप से स्वीकार िकया जाता है। िदपक्षी को आदेश िदया जाता है िक वह प्रािथनी कु सुमलता को प्राथर्नापत्र प्रस्तुत करने की ितिथ से वषर्-2005 तक 500/-रूपये (पांच सौ रूपये) प्रित माह जनवरी 2006 से िदसम्बर-2008 तक 750/- रूपये (सात सौ पचास रूपये) प्रितमाह, जनवरी - 2009 से िदसम्बर - 2011 तक मु०-1200/- रूपये (एक हजार दो सौ रुपये) प्रितमाह तथा जनवरी-2011 से िनणर्य की ितिथ तक 1800/-रूपये (एक हजार आठ सौ रूपये) प्रित माह की दर से भरणपोषण भत्ता अदा करें तथा िनणर्य की ितिथ से 2000/- रूपये (दो हजार रूपये) प्रितमाह की दर से गुजारा भत्ता अदा करें। माह िदसम्बर-2002 से िनणर्य की ितिथ तक गुजारा भत्ता की देय बकाया धनरािश चार बराबर िकश्तों में िनणर्य की ितिथ से एक वषर् के अन्दर अदा करना होगा िजसमें प्रथम िकश्त प्रथम ितमाही की अविध के अन्दर, िद्वतीय िकश्त िद्वतीय ितमाही की अविध के अन्दर, तृतीय देय िकश्त तृतीय ितमाही की अविध के अन्दर तथा चतुथर् देय िकश्त अिन्तम अथार्त् चतुथर् ितमाही की अविध के अन्दर अदा करेगा। िनणर्य की ितिथ से देय भरणपोषण भत्ता की अदायगी प्रत्येक माह की दस तारीख तरह की जायेगी।" For condoning the delay of 2876 days, in the affidavit filed in support of the application seeking condonation of delay the following averments have been made :- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anurag Dwivedi, Anuj Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raj Kumar .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) " 1. That the deponent is the revisionist himself in the present case and as such he is well acquainted with the facts of the case. 2. That due to lack of knowledge and some other unavoidable the deponent could not filled present criminal revision within prescribed time. 3. That if the delay is not being condone the deponent will suffer an irreparable loss." Taking note of the above quoted paragraphs of the affidavit wherein in fact no explanation has been given for condoning the huge delay of 2876 days as also the meager amount awarded by the Family Court towards the maintenance, this court finds that the application seeking condonation of delay is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is rejected. (Order on the Memo of Criminal Revision) Since the application for condonation of delay has been rejected, accordingly, the criminal revision cannot survive and the same is also rejected. September 9, 2025 ML/- CRLRD No. 449 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench