INDRAPAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/8880/2025 · 2025-09-16
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 163347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8880 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in the Court is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.K. Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel.
3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging that an illegal encroachment made on public utility land.
4. The fact that arises as per learned Standing Counsel is that in between the parties, a civil suit is also pending being Suit No.321 of 2015 and some orders have also been passed.
5. Considering the dispute to be inter se in between the private parties, no writ can be granted. The petitioner would be at liberty to agitate his rights in accordance with law.
6. The petition stands disposed of. September 16, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anupam Bajpai, Puneet Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Indrapal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench