IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 128 CWP-1849-2025 Date of Decision.:27.01.2025 Satpal Singh Pe//oner Vs. The Punjab State Coopera/ve Supply and Marke/ng Federa/on Ltd. and Ors. Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Lovedev Singh, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of this peon ﬁled under Arcle 226/227 of the Constuon of India, peoner prays for issuance of a writ of mandamus direcng the respondent No.2 to hear and decide the statutory departmental revision dated 30.07.2024 (Annexure P-5) along with applicaon for stay dated 30.07.2024 (Annexure P-6) ﬁled by the peoner against the order dated 11.06.2024 (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent No.1 being Appellate Authority and order dated 18.04.2023 (Annexure P-3) passed by respondent No.3, being Punishing Authority, in a me bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the peoner prays for deciding the revision peon 30.07.2024 (Annexure P-5) along with applicaon for stay dated 30.07.2024 (Annexure P-6) ﬁled by the peoner expediously by passing a speaking order in a me bound manner. He further prays that ll the ﬁnal disposal of the said revision peon, no recovery be made from the peoner. 3. Noce of moon. 4. Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate accepts noce on behalf of the respondents, ﬁled his memo of appearance and submits that he has no objecon to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the peoner. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.01.27 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1849-2025 -2- 5. I have heard learned counsel for the pares and have gone through the record of the case. 6. Respondent No.2-Revisional Authority is directed to decide the revision peon dated 30.07.2024 (Annexure P-5) along with applicaon for stay dated 30.07.2024 (Annexure P-6) ﬁled by the peoner, in accordance with law by passing a speaking order as expediously as possible preferable within a period of four months from the date of receipt of cerﬁed copy of this order. 7. Since the statutory revision peon ﬁled by the peoner is pending and yet to be decided, it will be in the interest of jusce that no further recovery be eﬀected from the peoner, ll disposal of said revision. 8. The peon stands disposed of in the above terms. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE January 27, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.01.27 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

SATPAL SINGH v. THE PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY AND MKTG FED LTD THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND OTHERS

Judgment text