1 2025:CGHC:17073-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1874 of 2025 Sunmarc Paper Industry Private Limited, Is A Company Incorporated In Terms Of The Companies Act 2013, Having Its Registered Office At - 404, Commercial Wing, Mangalam Sharddha, Model Mill Sq, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440032. ...Petitioner(s) versus Chhattisgarh Pathya Pustak Nigam Office Complex, Block B., Sector-24, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist. - Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492101. --- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Bhaduri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Biju Mattam, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. PN Bharat, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice. 15.04.2025. 1. Proceedings of the matter have been taken through video conferencing. 2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following reliefs: “i. Pass appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) thereby quashing/ setting-aside the impugned decision of the Respondent rejecting the Petitioner's Bid at technical stage, as notified in the GEM Portal on 29.03.2025; 2 ii. Pass appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) thereby quashing/ setting-aside the Impugned Decision of the Respondent of opening the Financial Bid and notification of putting the purportedly qualified Financial Bids for Reverse Auction in a post haste manner, as notified in the GEM Portal on 31.03.2025; iii. Pass appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) thereby directing the respondent to include and consider the Petitioner's Bid also in the evaluation and consideration of Financial Bid and for award of contract; iv. In case the relief sought in prayer (iii) is not possible due to any reasons including technical unfeasibility, pass appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) thereby quashing/ setting-aside the Bid titled as 'BID on GEM Portal for SUPPLY OF 70 GSM & 80 GSM WATER MARKED (CGPPN****) REEL MAPLITHO PAPER Conforming to BIS Specification 1848 (Part I):2018 with latest amendments in SIZE 84 CM WIDTH REEL'; and v. Pass any further appropriate writ, order, direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.” 3. At the outset, learned Senior Counsel seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 4. In view of above submission, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. CC as per rules. Sd/ Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice J.