HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5357 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction for expeditious disposal of Case No. 40, U/S 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act (Laxman Vs. Ratan). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case, respondent No.1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1- Consolidation Officer, Tehsil - Ram Sanehi Ghat, District Barabanki is directed to consider and decide Case No. 40, U/S 9A(2) of U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act (Laxman Vs. Ratan), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Chetram @ Chetai And Others .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Tehsil Ram Sanehi Ghat, Barabanki And Others .....Respondent(s) expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 5357 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench