Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 163324 (ALL)

ASHFAQUE ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLRD/443/2025 · 2025-09-10

Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 443 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. 1. Heard. 2. The present revision has been filed for the following main relief:- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned judgment and order dated 06.05.2025 passed by the Learned Principal Judge of Family Court, Bahraich in Case No.589/11/2017 "Smt. Sufiya Begam and another Vs. Ashfaque Ali, U/S-125 Cr.P.C., Police Station-Dargah Sharif, District-Bahraich." 3. By means of this revision alongwith an application seeking condonation of delay, the revisionist-Ashfaque Ali, has impeached the order dated 06.05.2025 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Bahraich (in short 'Family Court') in Case No. 589/11/2017 (Smt. Sufiya Begam and another Versus Ashfaque Ali), under Section 124 Cr.P.C. 4. The Operative portion of order dated 06.05.2025 reads as under:- "प्राथर्ना-पत्र अन्तगर्त धारा-125 दं०प्र०सं० आँिशक रूप से स्वीकार िकया जाता है। िवपक्षी को आदेिशत िकया जाता है िक वह प्राथर्ना-पत्र के प्रस्तुतीकरण की ितिथ से आवेिदका सं0-1 को मु० 3000/-(तीन हजार रूपये) प्रितमाह भरण पोषण तथा आवेिदका सं0-2 को 2000/- (दो हजार रूपये) उसके वयस्क होने की ितिथ तक प्रितमाह भरण पोषण अदा करे। भरणपोषण की धनरािश का भुगतान प्रत्येक माह के 07 तारीख को देय होगी। प्रस्तुत प्रकरण में आवेिदकागण द्वारा मु०सं०- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Vijay Kumar, Shobha Rajpoot Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ashfaque Ali .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 589/11/2017, श्रीमती सूिफया आिद बनाम अशफाक अली। अन्तिरम भरण पोषण के रूप में प्राप्त की गई धनरािश भरण पोषण की धनरािश में समायोिजत होगी। पत्रावली दािखल दफ्तर हो।" 5. At the very outset, learned Counsel for the revisionist states that the present application seeking condonation of delay alongwith the revision, be dismissed as not press, as the parties have settled their dispute amicably. 6. In view of aforesaid, the matter is consigned to record. September 10, 2025 Jyoti/- CRLRD No. 443 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench