DR. ANIL KUMAR GUPTA v. DR. SIDDHARTHA NIYOGI, DHS, HFWD, GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.
WP.ST/64/2025 · 2025-04-10
Madhuresh Prasad, Supratim Bhattacharya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16332 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16332 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10.04.2025 (D/L-28) Ct. No.4 (B.K.N.) W.P.S.T. 64 of 2025
Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta Vs. Dr. Siddhartha Niyogi, Director of Health Services, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Srikanta Dutta, Mr. Saiful Alam
...for the Petitioner
1. We find that a prayer has been made seeking a direction upon the Tribunal to dispose of the matter within a specific time frame. The issue is not in dispute that for want of Coram the matter could not be considered as there is no Judicial Member (Second Member) before the Tribunal.
2. In this circumstance which is not in dispute, we fail to understand as to how a direction can be issued to the Tribunal to consider the matter within a specified time frame.
3. We leave the petitioner to pursue the remedy before the Tribunal.
4. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J.)
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)